I still fully support this draft and encourage the IESG to move it forward. Thanks, ~Chris On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 16:03, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: > - 'IANA Reserved IPv4 Prefix for Shared CGN Space' > <draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-14.txt> as a BCP > > On its December 15, 2011 telechat, the IESG reviewed version 10 of this > document and requested various changes. These changes are reflected in > the draft version 14 and the IESG now solicits community input on the > changed text only. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@xxxxxxxx > mailing lists by 2012-02-16. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to > iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of > the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > This document requests the allocation of an IPv4 /10 address block to > be used as Shared Address Space to accommodate the needs of Carrier > Grade Network Address Translation (CGN) devices. It is anticipated > that Service Providers will use this Shared Address Space to number > the interfaces that connect CGN devices to Customer Premise Equipment > (CPE). > > Shared Address Space is distinct from RFC1918 private address space > because it is intended for use on Service Provider networks. > However, it may be used as RFC 1918 private address space in certain > circumstances. Details are provided in the text of this document. > > As this document proposes the allocation of an additional special-use > IPv4 address block, it updates RFC 5735. > > The following text captures the most salient change between version 10 and 14 of this document: > > Shared Address Space is IPv4 address space designated for Service > Provider use with the purpose of facilitating CGN deployment. Also, > Shared Address Space can be used as additional [RFC1918] space when > at least one of the following conditions is true: > > o Shared Address Space is not also used on the Service Provider side > of the CPE. > > o CPE routers behave correctly when using the same address block on > both the internal and external interfaces. > > > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce -- @ChrisGrundemann weblog.chrisgrundemann.com www.burningwiththebush.com www.theIPv6experts.net www.coisoc.org _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf