Yes -Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@xxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 10:10 AM > To: Stephen Hanna > Cc: Mark Nottingham; draft-nottingham-http-new-status@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > secdir@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: secdir review of draft-nottingham-http-new-status-03 > > On 2012-01-30 16:05, Stephen Hanna wrote: > > Mark, > > > > I don't want to rehash the discussion that we've already had. > > Clearly, you prefer brevity while I would prefer education in > > this instance. > > > > I can live with your text for status codes 428, 429, and 431. For > > 511, I don't think it's adequate to just say that big security > > issues already exist. You should at least give some suggestions > > for how to deal with them. For example, you could point out that > > most user agents include some indication of whether the server > > has been authenticated. For captive portals, this indication will > > generally not be displayed so the user receives some warning > > that the response did not come from the requested URL. > > Are you referring to HTTPS? > > Best regards, Julian _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf