----- Original Message ----- From: "todd glassey" <tglassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "t.petch" <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Alessandro Vesely" <vesely@xxxxxxx>; "ietf" <ietf@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 8:38 PM > On 1/21/2012 10:53 AM, t.petch wrote: > > Alessandro > > > > You could, of course, issue an updated version which simply says that its > > predecessor should not have been filed for the reasons you give in the e-mail. > > No need to include any other text whatsoever (except, of course, the relevant > > boiler plate). > > Tom > No actually he cant. That will complicate the matter since the IETF > publishing manner has specifically been set up to destroy the ability to > recall anything. The license to use per the copyright statement is > irrevocable even through the revisions process. Yes, you are right. The I-D has now vanished from the 'current' archive but is still accessible through the expired archive; mmm. It is very difficult to eliminate something from the Internet, so I think my suggestion of a later version explaining what happened could be valuable as belt and braces, reckoning people are more likely to retrieve it than an earlier version; or perhaps it would just draw people's attention to what should never have been:-( I dunno - IPR is so complicated. Tom Petch > That's right - it was published with a set of specific rights use > statements which are factually wrong and now the IETF is stuck with that > - unless a recall practice is put in place immediately like all other > publications houses have. > > > Todd > > > > > That seems simpler to me than asking the system to do something rather unusual > > that it may not have a mechanism to do. In future, there could always be > > another version moving the process forward in the appropriate direction. > > > > Tom Petch > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Alessandro Vesely" <vesely@xxxxxxx> > > To: <ietf-action@xxxxxxxx> > > Cc: "Zoltan Ordogh" <zordogh@xxxxxxx>; "apps discuss" <apps-discuss@xxxxxxxx>; > > "ietf" <ietf@xxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 4:03 PM > > Subject: Please remove draft-ordogh-spam-reporting-using-imap-kleansed fromI-D > > repository > > > > > >> Dear IETF Secretariat, > >> > >> I hereby ask that draft-ordogh-spam-reporting-using-imap-kleansed be > >> removed from the I-D repository. I submitted it on 10 Jan 2012, in a > >> clumsy attempt to speed up a discussion about a similarly named I-D, > >> draft-ordogh-spam-reporting-using-imap. The editing I carried out was > >> based on previous writing about, both privately and on IETF lists. > >> However, I hadn't obtained the author's permission to alter the > >> boilerplate-type of the original document. Thus, the document I > >> posted bears "wrong" copyright information. In particular, unwitting > >> editors may derive their own work from this document if they just > >> abide by its boilerplate text, while the original post did not imply a > >> handoff of change control. > >> > >> I apologize for any inconveniences that my action might have caused. > >> > >> Regards > >> Alessandro Vesely > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Ietf mailing list > >> Ietf@xxxxxxxx > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > >> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ietf mailing list > > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > > > > -- > Todd S. Glassey > This is from my personal email account and any materials from this > account come with personal disclaimers. > > Further I OPT OUT of any and all commercial emailings. > > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf