Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-15.txt> (The

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> 
> * Mike Jones wrote:
> >Thanks for asking, Martin.  That's effectively what the spec does
> >already.  It restricts the input values of these parameters to be quoted
>
>                   the HTTP specification does not give you an interface
> that allows you to tell `x` and `"x"` apart in this particular case. If
> the draft said "When using WWW-Authenticate: Bearer ... then the header
> name must be written `wWw-authenTICate`, same problem. HTTP says case
> does not matter, and if another specification says "Yes, it does" then
> it is overriding the underlying specification, to some degree anyway.

Of course, what oaep-bearer could _not_ "define to not exist"
(no matter how much anyone (group) might desire this), is those
transformations, and their complexity, that are permitted on HTTP
that headerfield, e.g. through "middle-boxes", such as client-side
HTTP proxies or server-side reverse-proxies between the original
creator and the final consumer, as well as permitted side-effects
of other application components sharing the same client (like a browser).

-Martin
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]