Re: secdir review of draft-nottingham-http-new-status-03

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14/01/2012, at 6:59 AM, Stephen Hanna wrote:

> I do have a question about the issues raised in Appendix B.
> These are all legitimate issues. However, it seems to me
> that having status code 511 should help with these. A
> browser or non-browser application could recognize status
> code 511 as an indication that a captive portal is in use
> and avoid capturing favicons, looking for P3P files, and
> doing other things that should wait until after the captive
> portal is blocking access. When the original website stops
> returning 511, such activities could resume. I may be wrong
> in suggesting these ideas but if not it would be good to
> note them here.

I've added a note linking the issues to 511 more explicitly. Thanks,


--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]