RE: FYI : Canada's CRTC mandates all IP Interconnection for voice.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I didn't suggest that. It's clear in the Canadian Order that if you provide
SIP interconnection to anyone you have to make it available to everyone. 

But as you correctly point out, I doubt such carriers either exist or will
exist much longer. It does create a more level playing field. This Order
clearly sidestepped the issue of a shot clock for full TDM retirement,
though a review of the Order is suggested for 2014. 

I thought Paragraph 69-70 on establishing a Canadian carrier ENUM database
personally amusing. 

The larger issue for our community is the existing NNI profiles have not
been updated in years and there is still a huge gap analysis that needs to
be undertaken that may require further IETF RAI work. I haven't seen that
started yet. We haven't heard the last of this by any means. 

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Kevin P. Fleming
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 4:54 PM
To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: FYI : Canada's CRTC mandates all IP Interconnection for voice.

On 01/24/2012 02:28 PM, Richard Shockey wrote:
> /In this decision, the Commission decides that it is in the public
> interest to establish a set of principles to facilitate IP voice network
> interconnections between network operators while allowing market forces
> to shape the details of the arrangements. Specifically, in areas where a
> carrier provides IP voice interconnection to an affiliate, a division of
> its operations, or an unrelated service provider, the carrier must
> negotiate a similar arrangement with any other carrier that requests
> such an arrangement. Within six months of a formal request, an
> arrangement is to be concluded./
>
> http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/com100/2012/r120119.htm

I think that your subject is a bit misleading. This decision does not 
'outlaw' non-IP interconnection, nor does it obligate a carrier that is 
not currently IP-interconnected (if such a carrier exists) to become so 
connected. It only levels the playing field and ensures that all 
IP-interconnected carriers make IP interconnection available to any 
other carrier that is interested in it, not just the 'chosen few'.

-- 
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber: kfleming@xxxxxxxxxx | SIP: kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxx | Skype: kpfleming
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]