Re: ITC copped out on UTC again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Phillip" == Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
    Phillip> If we are ever going to get a handle on Internet time we
    Phillip> need to get rid of the arbitrary correction factors
    Phillip> introduced by leap seconds.

    Phillip> The problems caused by leap seconds are that they make it
    Phillip> impossible for two machines to know if they are referring
    Phillip> to the same point in future time and quite often introduce
    Phillip> errors in the present.

Can you tell me which protocols use future timestamps in an moving form
(not stored at rest in a certificate in a DANE RR, for instance), which
care about discrepancies of less than 1 minute?

I'm asking for information.

-- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
	               then sign the petition. 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]