Thanks. In an editorial nit, the first example in 2.1 still uses the "disclosure-list" relationship type. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@xxxxxx> (@roessler) On 2012-01-04, at 07:29 +0100, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > So I've submitted the revised version, taking into account all the LC > comments, and the consensus on defining W3C's current practice (as I > see many comments received with this respect) rather than two separate > relation types. A number of other edits have been made; you may see > the diffs at http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-01 > and the draft at > tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-01. > Meanwhile, as the document is deferred to next IESG telechat, you may > freely submit your comments on this version, either publicly or > privately to the author. > > Mykyta Yevstifeyev > > 2012/1/4 Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> <hat type='AD'/> >> >> On 1/2/12 12:36 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: >> >>> While that was me who proposed the change to semantics, I tend more >>> and more to agree with documenting the existing practice; but let's >>> wait a response from W3C community first to see what's their attitude >>> towards the proposal. >> >> Mykyta, >> >> You have not yet submitted a revised I-D. Currently the document under >> consideration is draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00. If you want >> to make fundamental changes to the spec, please do so by submitting a >> revised I-D. >> >> In the meantime, I have deferred the document to the January 19 telechat >> while you decide how you want to proceed. >> >> If you decide that you want to define two link relations instead of one, >> you will need to submit a revised I-D, which will need to undergo >> another review on the link-relations@xxxxxxxx list and then another IETF >> Last Call. >> >> There is no need to waste IESG and general IETF attention on this >> specification if the author can't make up his mind about his own intentions. >> >> Peter >> >> -- >> Peter Saint-Andre >> https://stpeter.im/ >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf