Hi,
I think this is great news that two vendors are shipping a pre-standard
implementations and are willing to produce implementation survey on it.
However I do support both Danny's and Shane's concerns.
In addition I have already voiced my own concern that current scenario
only discusses one particular deployment model where all edge ASBRs
perform validation and that the validation data comes from local caches.
IMHO this is way too limited model for any practical deployment of BGP
Origin Validation.
Best regards,
R.
Folks,
I like to voice my support (on behalf of Cisco Systems) as well. Cisco
Systems has recently shipped RPKI Router protocol implementation (in IOS
software release).
Our implementation has been tested with two different RPKI cache
implementations (RIPE, RPKI.NET) and is currently going through lab tests
with our customers.
We are also in process of writing an implementation survey for this
protocol.
Regards,
Keyur
On 12/20/11 11:27 PM, "Hannes Gredler"<hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hi,
hereby i want to declare (by myself and on behalf of Juniper Networks Inc.),
support for the the rpki-rtr protocol. Juniper Networks Inc. has got an
implementation
of the protocol based on, draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-19. Our implementation
passed interop testing with 3 different rpki caches (BBN, RIPE, ISC) and got
a exposure to a couple of our tier-1 SP customers for labe test purposes.
thanks !
/hannes
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf