> From: Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> The CGN space seems like a very good place to use 240.0/10.
> A single organization often controls and specifies all equipment which
> will use the address space
Not _exclusively_ 240/, though, because as has been pointed out numerous
times, for many contemplated CGN deployments, the CPE equipment connected
directly to the CGN-fronted fabric will be that already owned by the
customers, and with home customers, that may cover a very, very wide stretch
of manufacturers and models - i.e. whatever those customers already own. And
many of them won't support 240/.
As I already pointed out:
>> I suspect that CGNs are not, by and large, targetted to entirely new
>> customers ... as customer bases grow, some ISPs don't have enough
>> 'public' space to give one to each customer any more, so they want to
>> deploy CGN - and they need address space for the chunk of fabric
>> between the CGNs and the CPEs. In other words, its mostly _existing_
>> customers who are about to be CGN'd.
But as I previously pointed out in another message (too lazy to dig it up),
I do think we should have a chunk of 240/ space as _part_ of the CGN
allocation.
Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf