>>>>> "David" == David Conrad <drc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
David> On Dec 7, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> The CGN space seems like a very good place to use 240.0/10.
David> I believe the main driver behind this discussion is the need
David> to deal with deployed non-field-upgradable CPE that has
David> issues with having RFC 1918 space being assigned on the WAN
David> interface. I'd guess said hardware would also likely have
David> issues with 240/4 space being instead.
You'd guess, or you know.
I'd like to see 240.0/10 assigned for this purpose, regardless of
whether or not we assign another block.
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf