Re: Consensus Call: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



    > From: Mark Andrews <marka@xxxxxxx>

    > The CGN boxes are new. The customer boxes which are being allocated the
    > addresses are old. Lots of these boxes will not work with a 240/4
    > address.

Here's a question, though: would a mix of a smaller block of 'classic' IPv4
space, _along with_ a big chunk of 240/4, be of any use?

I ask because I gather there are a lot of situations where e.g. a cable modem
has an ISP-local address on its ISP-facing side, and a global IP address
(which the customer gets) on the customer side. (I see this in checking out my
path to the Internet from my house - I see some 10.xx addresses on the other
side of the cable modem.) Could a block of 240/ space be used for things like
that?

Sure, the 240/ space wouldn't be useful as a source of addresses for
_customer-owned_ equipment - but could it be useful elsewhere inside an ISP's
network? (And perhaps also as a source of addresses for CPE equipment which
_will_ tolerate being given a 240/ space address, although I concede that may
be very few boxes, at least at first.)

	Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]