Re: Consensus Call: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Andrews wrote:

> 224/10 could be made to work with new equipement provided there was
> also signaling that the equipment supported it.  That doesn't help
> ISP that have new customers with old equipment and no addresses.

Yes, it takes time.

However, 224/4 (or most of it) and 240/4 (except for 255.255.255.255)
should be released for unicast uses to reduce market price on
IPv4 addresses.

						Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]