Re: [IETF] Re: Consensus Call: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


But (also realistically) a "sufficiently large enterprise" that uses all of RFC1918 is not going to be sitting behind a CGN...

W

Big enterprises buy small ones; sometimes at a great rate.  Imagine an enterprise that uses this /12 for its corporate network buying a wee little company that was connected via CGN up to the purchase.  The order in which they renumber/get attachments to the new mothership/ start passing traffic from this /12 gets just a little bit more strict and the chance of ticket-inducing failure goes up just that extra amount.

Ted
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]