In simpler terms, what I want is a document that clearly implies 6to4-PMT is not applicable with this new Shared CGN Address Space. No, I am not joking, and I'm very sorry that I had to bring up the topic of 6to4 again.
I appreciate your position. I am also biased as much as you and others are on this. But I would like to point out that PMT has worked in a large production network with much success (as ugly as one may think it is).
The reality is that it works, and works well when using non-RFC1918 on CGN zone endpoints. When 6to4 goes away or Native is enabled, so will PMT (for those who choose to use it).
regards,
Victor
--
j h woodyatt <jhw@xxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf