Ralph, I'm not sure what would take longer - getting new subscriber gws supporting 240/4 or IPv6 into the field, and I know which one I'd prefer vendor engineers to be working on ;-). Chris On 12/1/11 6:06 AM, "Ralph Droms" <rdroms.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Those subscriber GWs would have to handle 240.0.0.0/10 traffic correctly, >and there would likely have to be some small amount of parallel RFC 1918 >space in the ISP core network for servers, hosts, etc. Of course, I'm >not an operator, so I'd be happy to hear why I'm confused. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf