Chris, On Nov 30, 2011, at 12:28 PM, Chris Grundemann wrote: > "They" will deploy CGN with or without us. True. > We are giving "them" a way to do it in the least disruptive way. Could you expand on the disruption you believe would be minimized by implementation of this draft? That is, what do you believe would happen if this draft is not accepted and the /10 allocation is not made? The draft doesn't spell this out explicitly (as far as I can tell) and I suspect much of the discussion revolves around different interpretations of the disruption. Thanks, -drc _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf