Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Nov 30, 2011, at 6:27 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: >> >> Seriously, I think we *SHOULD* use 240/10. >> (let's keep some for the next horrible hack) > > I agree, this is a good use of the "Experimental" Class E IPv4 addresses. > It seems to me that this is for new deployments (the CDN gear and new > customer CPE equipment). The operators who want this should be able to > make this work and and incur the cost for doing so. While I am neither for nor against allocation of a /10 from ordinary routable space, I would strongly favor allocation of a /10 from 240/4. It's not obvious to me from reading draft-weil why this wouldn't work; and I believe that allocations from 240/4 are quite appropriate, given the imminent exaustion of ordinary IPv4 space. -- John Leslie <john@xxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf