Re: An Antitrust Policy for the IETF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011-11-29 14:51, John Levine wrote:
>> Here is some relevant language from the Complaint:
>>
>> "100.   By their failures to monitor and enforce the SSO Rules, and to
>> respond to TruePosition's  specific complaints concerning violations of the
>> SSO Rules, 3GPP and ETSI have acquiesced in, are responsible for, and
>> complicit in, the abuse of authority and anticompetitive conduct ...
> 
> As I read that, we'd be much better off having no antitrust policy
> at all. Any volunteers to monitor and enforce whatever policy our
> lawyer invents?

John, if they'd had no relevant rules, it would probably have read

>> "100.   By their failures to promulgate appropriate SSO Rules, and to
>> respond to TruePosition's  specific complaints concerning resultant violations
>> of antitrust laws, 3GPP and ETSI have acquiesced in, are responsible for, and
>> complicit in, the abuse of authority and anticompetitive conduct ...

WG Chairs and ADs are already responsible for applying IETF process rules.

   Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]