Re: An Antitrust Policy for the IETF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Here is one lawsuit that I noticed in the press this summer:
http://www.cellular-news.com/story/50118.php


On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:35 PM, GTW wrote:

Ted, I like your approach of enquiring what problem we are striving to solve and I like Russ's concise answer that it is "Recent suits against other SDOs that  is the source of the concern" 
 
Russ, what are  some of the  "Recent suits against other SDOs"  It would be good to pin down the problem we are addressing
 
There is  FTC and N-data matter from 2008 http://www.gtwassociates.com/alerts/Ndata1.htm
 
But the solutions in discussion in various SDOs to the issues raised in that matter have to do with  revisions to IP policies  more than with  antitrust policy.
 
Best Regards,
 
George T. Willingmyre, P.E.
President, GTW Associates
1012 Parrs Ridge Drive
Spencerville, MD 20868 USA
1.301.421.4138
----- Original Message -----
From: IETF Chair
Cc: IETF ; IESG
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: An Antitrust Policy for the IETF

Ted:

The IETF legal counsel and insurance agent suggest that the IETF ought to have an antitrust policy.  To address this need, a lawyer is needed.  As a way forward, I suggest that IASA pay a lawyer to come up with an initial draft, and then this draft be brought to the community for review and comment (and probably revision).  I think a new mail list should be used for the discussion.  Once the new mail list reaches rough consensus on the antitrust policy document, I suggest using the usual process for adopting the policy as an IETF BCP.

What do others think?  I am open to suggestions for an alternative approach.


Sorry, can you expand on the threat model here?  Are we developing one in order to defend against some specific worry about our not having one?  Because it has become best practice in other SDOs?  Because the insurance agent wishes to see something in particular?

I hesitate to develop something that we have not needed in the past unless it is clear what benefit it gives us.  In particular, if we develop one without some particular characteristic, do we lose the benefits of being where we are now?

Recent suits against other SDOs is the source of the concern.  The idea is t make it clear which topics are off limits at IETF meetings and on IETF mail lists.  In this way, if such discussions take place, the good name of the IETF can be kept clean.

Russ



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]