Noel, > -----Original Message----- > From: Noel Chiappa [mailto:jnc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 8:40 AM > To: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Cc: jnc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: LISP is not a Loc-ID Separation protocol > > > > From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >> .. an LEID which is assigned to a virtual interface, > one which is created > >> _solely_ as a place to hold the system's identity .. > >> ... > >> .. a name which i) is purely identity, ii) has no > location info of > >> any kind in it, iii) cannot be used for forwarding > anywhere, etc, etc. > >> > >> Where in that list is any difference from a 'real' EID > (in the sense > >> of 'name for an end system')? > > > My point is proven by the analogy I gave in the > previous iteration > > I am still interested to hear if there is any effective > difference you can > point to? You can't just refuse to engage in my analogy: https://www.ietf.org/ibin/c5i?mid=6&rid=49&gid=0&k1=933&k2=60357&tid=1320334244 and then demand that I engage in yours. Thanks - Fred fred.l.templin@xxxxxxxxxx > Noel > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf