RE: LISP is not a Loc-ID Separation protocol

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Noel, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Noel Chiappa
> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 7:08 AM
> To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Cc: jnc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: LISP is not a Loc-ID Separation protocol
> 
>     > From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>     > Let's say the end system also has multiple loopback 
> interfaces - say it
>     > has two, for example.
> 
> Why? What does that buy you?

The multiple loopback interfaces (or, more generally,
the multiple internal virtual interfaces) are in one
to one correspondence with the end system's multiple
VPN connections. The internal virtual interfaces keep
the VPNs separate.

>     > Which one (A or B) is the end system's identity?
> 
> Suppose I assign two endpoint identifiers to a host. Which is 
> the host's
> identity?

Neither - that's the point. The host's identify is
not bound to any one or multiple IP addresses.

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@xxxxxxxxxx
 
> 	Noel
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]