Re: Last Call: RFC 979 (PSN End-to-End functional specification) to HISTORIC RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



where is the written justification?

recording a reason will help people in the future understand why this was done

I object to a reclassification without a RFC saying why

Scott

On Oct 27, 2011, at 4:16 PM, IESG Secretary wrote:

The IESG has received a request from an individual to reclassify RFC 979 
(PSN End-to-End functional specification) to HISTORIC. The current status 
of this document is UNKNOWN.

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits 
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the 
ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2011-11-24. Exceptionally, comments may 
be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the 
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]