On Sep 23, 2011 1:41 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2011-09-23 17:21, Benson Schliesser wrote:
>
> > However, I would like to make sure we don't lose sight of the need
> > for some urgency with draft-weil.
>
> I'm a little puzzled by the claim of urgency; I remember hearing in
> July 2008 that doom was imminent if this was not done immediately.
>
> I thought that the urgent issue was deploying IPv6.
>
> On 2011-09-23 20:38, SM wrote:
> ...
> > I suggest that ARIN publishes its policy through the Independent Stream
> > and documents the IPv4 addresses that will be used for so-called shared
> > transition space.
>
> What makes you think that the Independent stream would publish such an
> RFC, which on the face of it would be a complete end-run around the
> IETF process, and fly in the face of the IAB position?
>
+1
Additionally, this network operator and ARIN member is fully opposed to any shared address draft. Real routable addresses are need for real routable systems.
There is no free lunch, these efforts should be focused on making 240/4 work or doing ipv6, not ripping of really working ipv4 space.
Both of the above are hard ... sorry.
Cb
> Brian
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf