Re: IAOC: delegating ex-officio responsibility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sep 21, 2011, at 4:27 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:

>> 
>> It is important for the I* chairs to be connected with the community.
>> It is important for the IAOC to be connected with the community.
>> It is important for the I* chairs to be informed about what is happening in the IAOC
>> It is important for the IAOC to be informed about what the I* chairs find important.
>> 
> 
> Yes, but I don't understand your point.  We get that today with the current makeup.  Your proposal breaks these links.

Oops..I did not finish the paragraph.


Retry:
>> It is important for the I* chairs to be connected with the community.
>> It is important for the IAOC to be connected with the community.
>> It is important for the I* chairs to be informed about what is happening in the IAOC
>> It is important for the IAOC to be informed about what the I* chairs find important.

I claim that the first two items are independent of I* chairs being voting members of the IAOC.

I also claim that for the third item there is no necessity for the I* chairs to be a voting member, nor for the fourth. That said, I am sensitive to the argument that if I* chairs are members they may actually pay more attention (human nature and such) and that being effective at those item without being a member is tough.

--Olaf





________________________________________________________ 

Olaf M. Kolkman                        NLnet Labs
http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/











     

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]