Re: IAOC: delegating ex-officio responsibility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> "Olaf" == Olaf Kolkman <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

   Olaf> Dear Colleagues,

   Olaf> I have just chartered a very short draft that intends to
   Olaf> update BCP101. It can be found at:
   Olaf> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kolkman-iasa-ex-officio-membership

   Olaf> The draft is very short and contains only a few sentences of
   Olaf> substance:

   Olaf>    The IETF chair, the IAB chair, and the ISOC President/CEO
   Olaf> may delegate their responsibilities to other persons.  The
   Olaf> delegations by the IETF chair and the IAB chair need to be
   Olaf> confirmed by the IESG and IAB respectively.  The terms of
   Olaf> delegation is for a longer term for instance aligned with the
   Olaf> IESG and IAB appointment cycles (roughly anual).


I'm strongly in favor of the principle behind this draft.

Presumably the delegate would be subject to recall through the normal
recall process (as are all IAOC members today except for the ISOC
president)

You should spell out things like whether the delegating IAOC member may
recall their delegation and whether the body (IAB/IESG) may recall the
delegate.

Note that the current draft does not mention the word delegate, except to note that it was removed. 
These would be full members, with the full fiduciary responsibility of membership. That means, for example, that
they might feel compelled to vote against the desires of their nominating body. 

Recall is not mentioned by the draft, and thus it would follow the rules of BCP 101 and RFC 3777. Note that, according to 
BCP 101

"IAOC members are
   not, however, subject to recall by the bodies that appointed them."

This draft does not change that. 

 

You should consider whether the IAOC needs to accept the delegate.

These would be full members, neither the IAOC nor the Trust would have any discretion in accepting them. 

Regards 
Marshall
 

I think the above issues should be considered.
No specific results to the consideration of those issues would be
blocking for me. I think this is a great idea!

I do think a mechanism like this could be used badly. So we should be
responsible:-)
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]