Re: Pre-IETF RFCs to Historic (not really proposing)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
From: "Cyrus Daboo" <cyrus@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Keith Moore" <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Ronald Bonica"
<rbonica@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Scott O Bradner" <sob@xxxxxxxxxxx>; "IETF Discussion" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 4:52 PM

> Hi Keith,
>
> --On September 16, 2011 10:10:06 AM -0400 Keith Moore
> <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I think we need a low-overhead and relatively informal mechanism of
> > reporting errata and requesting clarifications, and maybe that it should
> > be expanded a bit to serve as an implementation and interoperability
> > reporting mechanism.  But I don't think that having such a mechanism
> > requires us to maintain expertise in every subject matter area covered by
> > every RFC.
>
> Again I would like to bring up the idea of every RFC having an associated
> wiki page(s). The goal here is to provide a way for implementors to add
> comments, annotations, clarifications, corrections etc to augment the RFCs.

Lovely idea, but not something I see as part of the IETF's mission.  It is so
easy
these days to set up a web site and wiki page that any editor of an RFC,
producer
of an implementation, can do it if they so choose.  Making it part of the IETF
gives it a standing that the resources available to review it would never be
able to put right any but the most egregious mistakes.

Tom Petch

> Whilst such commentary can often be found on IETF mailing lists after an
> RFC is published locating those and searching them can be tedious - plus
> the full history of discussion on various points is often not relevant to
> an implementor - all they need to know is what is the correct way to do it
> now.
>
> Doing something like this would obviously require some investment in
> additional infrastructure. There are also questions about how we would
> maintain the integrity of the information on the wiki pages, but I think
> those are things we can easily address.
>
> --
> Cyrus Daboo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]