On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 9/12/2011 12:00 PM, Robert Thurlow wrote:
>> Joe Touch wrote:
>> We don't want to enumerate all NFS servers in a domain.
>
> That's what SRV records do. If that's not what you want, you should consider
> defining a new RR type.
No.... We don't want to enumerate *all* NFSv4 servers in a domain. We
want to enumerate all NFSv4 domain-root servers in a domain. Slight
difference.
Now, if we only ever intended to discovery domain-root NFSv4 servers,
then we could just follow RFC2782. But what if we want to add some
new role like domain-root, but not domain-root, for NFSv4 servers? I
suppose we could punt on this till then, but it seems unclean to do so
-- it's much cleaner to denote the role of the server ("domain root")
in the RRset name.
Nico
--
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf