Sasha
On 30/08/2011 13:22, Alexander Vainshtein wrote:
Stewart,
I believe that your item #1 is presumably addressed by
draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw (with the changes you’ve proposed),
draft-nadeau-pwe3-vccv-2 is an attempt to address your item #2, and
your item #3 is not yet addressed. Is this understanding correct?
Yes
I also think that one of the items in the discussion was the
restriction on ECMP in MPLS to skip reserved labels. I am not sure if
it has been properly addressed anywhere, so should not it constitute
item #4?
Yes-ish, here I am concerned about the practical ability to do that
given the extent of deployed LSRs that do not do that.
My point here was to note the scope of this draft (which is is IESG review).
Other drafts need to make their own case for what they want to do and
how they propose to do it.
Stewart
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf