Re: [mpls] [PWE3] IETF Last Call comment on draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sasha



On 30/08/2011 13:22, Alexander Vainshtein wrote:

Stewart,

I believe that your item #1 is presumably addressed by draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw (with the changes you’ve proposed), draft-nadeau-pwe3-vccv-2 is an attempt to address your item #2, and your item #3 is not yet addressed. Is this understanding correct?

Yes

I also think that one of the items in the discussion was the restriction on ECMP in MPLS to skip reserved labels. I am not sure if it has been properly addressed anywhere, so should not it constitute item #4?

Yes-ish, here I am concerned about the practical ability to do that given the extent of deployed LSRs that do not do that.

My point here was to note the scope of this draft (which is is IESG review).

Other drafts need to make their own case for what they want to do and how they propose to do it.

Stewart



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]