-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/30/2011 12:18 PM, Keith Moore wrote: > On Aug 30, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Adam Roach wrote: > >> Does "SHOULD" get abused by some authors in some documents? Of course it does. >> But your crusade to throw out a useful tool just because it has been misused >> on occasion is an extreme over-reaction. I like this tool. I use this tool. If >> you see people misusing it, slap them. >> >> But don't ban the tool. > > +1 > I am wondering if having an Implementers Directorate, tasked to do reviews from an implementation point of view, could not help discovering when a SHOULD can create interoperability problems. I would certainly volunteer in such group. - -- Marc Petit-Huguenin Personal email: marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Professional email: petithug@xxxxxxx Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk5dQT4ACgkQ9RoMZyVa61eU3gCglqmaf07bpE1RJU9oN3YotGgS T+oAoKeRCXuB2Ea+Bzy+nw+A7er0kURv =bHul -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf