Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Henry" == Henry B Hotz <hotz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Henry> I was thinking that if it's a proprietary OTP, we can still
    Henry> use it even if the algorithm is secret.  If we know we're
    Henry> getting a "clear text" OTP value and we have an (unspecified)
    Henry> method of verifying it against some external infrastructure,
    Henry> that's enough to use otp-preauth.  However I don't think this
    Henry> actually requires a complete registry.  A single
    Henry> undefined/external entry for the existing PSKC registry would
    Henry> be sufficient, wouldn't it?

It's exactly the proprietary OTPs where I think they should specify
their own URI in their own namespace.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]