Re: https

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 26, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Tim Bray wrote:

I'm increasingly coming to think that *everything* should be done with
TLS unless you can prove it's harmful.  Call me paranoid, but given
the general state of the world, secure-by-default seems like the way
to go.  -Tim

You're not alone.  I think one reason this discussion suddenly flared up so dramatically is that this is at least as much a political issue as a technical one, and therefore not exactly the IETF's bailiwick.  EFF certainly seems to think so:


Nowadays the only reason I can see for not wanting to use any form of encryption you can, anywhere and anytime you can, is a desire to make it easier for governments to snoop on you.  Even flawed or partial schemes can provide some protection if deployed widely enough -- it's the same principle as steganography, more or less.  -- Nathaniel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]