+1 for me as well for either proposed new schedule. On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:04 AM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > +1. I could also happily live with the alternate, more > compressed, schedule -- I think both are preferable to the > schedule used in Quebec and earlier. > > john > > > --On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 07:40 +0200 Eliot Lear > <lear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> >> On 8/22/11 11:24 PM, IETF Chair wrote: >>> The IESG is considering a different schedule for the Friday >>> of IETF 82. The IESG is seeking your input on these >>> potential changes. >>> >>> The IESG would like to try a schedule experiment on Friday, >>> using this schedule: >>> >>> 9:00 AM - 11:00 AM - Session I >>> 11:00 AM - 11:20 AM - Room Change and Cookie Break >>> 11:20 AM - 12:20 PM - Session II >>> 12:10 PM - 12:30 PM - Room Change Break >>> 12:30 PM - 13:30 PM - Session III >>> >>> The IESG has already consulted with the IAOC because of the >>> cost associated with the additional food and beverage break. >>> The IAOC believes that the additional cost can be managed >>> without raising the meeting fee. >> >> I think this is a good experiment to run as proposed. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf