>>>>> "Greg" == Greg Hudson <ghudson@xxxxxxx> writes:
87
Greg> On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 08:53 -0400, gareth.richards@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> I had always thought the same way as Sam, that clients would be
>> required to implement all of the options since there appears to
>> be no other way for them to support different disconnected token
>> types. The specification was intended to be token independent
>> and the assumption was always that the clients would also be.
Greg> I agree, at least at the general level and for disconnected
Greg> tokens. (Does nextOTP make any sense for disconnected
Greg> tokens?)
I think you prompt the person to hit the next value button
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf