Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 8, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John C Klensin [mailto:john-ietf@xxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 9:19 AM
>> To: Murray S. Kucherawy; ietf@xxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list
>> 
>> (4) Others (probably a partially overlapping group with (3))
>> just find more rules and requirements for more boilerplate
>> undesirable.  They would (at least mostly) be happy if lots of
>> off-list notes went to authors of I-Ds for which the discussion
>> forum wasn't clear, asking them about the discussion forum and
>> recommending that it be included in the next draft.   That might
>> actually encourage discussion and would be as, or more,
>> effective at retraining authors than more rules.
> 
> This is my preference.  If the author(s) don't include a "discuss this here" section, then they're inviting direct comments, and maybe that's what they prefer.  If not, they will quickly learn to either find or create a forum, even if that's just ietf@xxxxxxxx, and mention such in the draft.

+1

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]