> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely > Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:28 AM > To: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email > > > It was not a difficult problem. [...] how to scale the > > authorization of 3rd party signer. [...] But there was a > > fundamental mindset and marketing conflict. It was a conflict of > > 3rd party resigner market right to exist uncontrolled, unrestricted > > regardless of originating DKIM message claims. > > Marketing pressure on IETF protocols may be business as usual, but > DKIM managed to come out pretty cleanly neutral in this respect, > AFAICS[*]. I think the claim that marketing somehow entered into the guidance of DKIM's evolution is specious, and that's being polite. I've yet to see any evidence at all, short of unfounded assertions about the unspoken agendas of the participants, to back it up. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf