I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-yevstifeyev-ion-report-06 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2011–7–31 IETF LC End Date: 2011–8–9 IESG Telechat date: Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an informational RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: I read in section 3.2 “The IESG has determined that IONs will not be used in the future. It is clear that the IESG, IAB, and IAOC need the ability to publish documents that do not expire and are easily updated. Information published as web pages, including IESG Statements, are sufficient for this purpose.” I was wondering that since the ION process required approval for the document to be published, what will be the approval process when using web pages. It is probably not part of this document but it is just a question and I see no problem with publishing this document. Nits/editorial comments: |
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf