+1 IMHO, it does make a lot of sense. (I made a similar comment before reading this one)-. Regards, RD Le 27 juil. 2011 à 18:14, Noel Chiappa a écrit : >> From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> I think it would be quite weird to keep 6to4 at standards track just to >> prevent some vendors from dropping 6to4 support. > > There have been suggestions that it might be more appropriate to reclassify > it as Experimental, and I think that makes a lot of sense - as you correctly > (IMO) point out, due to its issues 6to4 is not really appropriate for > standards track (at least, in its current form). > > Noel > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf