Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



    > From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

    > I think it would be quite weird to keep 6to4 at standards track just to
    > prevent some vendors from dropping 6to4 support.

There have been suggestions that it might be more appropriate to reclassify
it as Experimental, and I think that makes a lot of sense - as you correctly
(IMO) point out, due to its issues 6to4 is not really appropriate for
standards track (at least, in its current form).

	Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]