Re: On attending BoFs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



... and if the room isn't full, that's interesting information too.


On 28/07/2011, at 4:10 PM, Eric Burger wrote:

> +$1.00
> 
> Have we ever had a BOF that looked under-attended? Not me: always standing room only!
> 
> Big rooms = good BOF.
> 
> On Jul 28, 2011, at 4:37 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
>> On 7/28/11 4:06 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> 
>>> When we ask for a BoF room, we need to give an indication of estimated
>>> attendance.  Sometimes it’s hard to make a good guess and so we
>>> underestimate, intending to keep larger rooms available for groups that
>>> need them.
>> 
>> I think the BoF chairs and responsible ADs need to request larger rooms
>> for BoFs. After the REPUTE BOF, I talked with the Secretariat
>> (specifically Wanda Lo, who does an amazing job with the schedule!)
>> about poking the chairs and ADs when they request BoF rooms to make sure
>> that we don't assign small rooms to BoFs, at least without careful
>> consideration.
>> 
>> Peter
>> 
>> -- 
>> Peter Saint-Andre
>> https://stpeter.im/
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf mailing list
>> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]