Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 14:18, Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So essentially, the argument that "6to4 damages the Internet", is tantamount to "having multiple addresses for hosts damages the Internet".

And this is an explicitly chosen architectural "feature" of IPv6.

Having multiple addresses for hosts damages the Internet
Multiple addresses for hosts damages the Internet
-> IPv6 damages the Internet

I give up. I wish you a productive discussion from here on.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]