On Jul 27, 2011, at 7:31 AM, Mark Townsley <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Jul 27, 2011, at 7:09 AM, Fred Baker wrote: > >> >> On Jul 26, 2011, at 6:49 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> >>> Since 6to4 is a transition mechanism it has no long term future *by definition*. Even if someone chooses to design a v2, who is going to implement it? >> >> Actually, I think one could argue pretty effectively that 6rd is 6to4-bis. > > +1 > > - Mark +2 > >> _______________________________________________ >> v6ops mailing list >> v6ops@xxxxxxxx >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf