Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If you have a reason to install and enable 6to4, why would the nominal
status of a couple of RFCs make you do anything different?

This seems like an easy question to answer.   You'd implement and use 6to4v2 because it works better than the historic 6to4 protocol.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]