Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi -

> From: "Noel Chiappa" <jnc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <jnc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 3:05 PM
> Subject: Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
...
> I think we should only mark things as HISTORIC as a recognition of _what has
> already happened_ out in the world, not as an attempt to _make something
> happen_.
...

Though I think this is a reasonable position, there are examples from
history, such as the "historicization" of RFC 1227, that clearly demonstrate
that the IETF has historically not consistently maintained this position.

Randy

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]