Brian, > Brian E Carpenter wrote: > To be clear, I'd like to see exact proposed text before > expressing support for the proposal. The trick is to get > 6to4 disabled by default at the user end, without disabling > it for users who are getting good service from it. Although I commend Ron from trying "something else", I think this particular approach is doomed to fail. Maybe I'm reading the list wrong, but I think the sticky point here is the "historic" thing, and nothing short of removing that part will significantly change the mindset of people who oppose it. Have you considered a newer revision of the 6-to-4 RFCs that would obsolete the current ones and add that 6-to-4 should be disabled by default? That could reach consensus. Michel. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf