In message <4E28A51F.4020704@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bruce Atherton writes: > > I admit that I find it a little troubling to use MUST for the client to > follow this procedure as there is a burden on implementers to understand > how to code this since it isn't done by default in the standard > libraries the way that ordinary name resolution is. Making it the > recognized best practice with a SHOULD would be preferable all else > being equal. No. MUST is what is needed. It's a new protocol. Do what's best from day one. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf