Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard

[David Endicott <dendicott@xxxxxxxxx>]

I am strongly opposed to any MUST definition for any type of URL resolution.

I'm ok with inheriting / mimicking HTTP.    Since it is intended to live in the same universe as HTTP, I'm ok with it sharing mechanisms / limitations.

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

2011/7/21 Dave Cridland <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> It's proven impossible, despite effort, to retrofit SRV onto HTTP; there is
> no way it'll be possible to retrofit onto WS.

Right. If WS borns with no SRV (as a MUST for WS clients) then just
forget it and let inherit all the ugly limitations from HTTP protocol.

--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@xxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf