On Jun 14, 2011, at 1:59 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > That said, I would argue that most or all 6to4 traffic could just as well use IPv4, since both parties to the communication obviously have access to a public IPv4 address. What is the advantage of using 6to4 over IPv4 that makes it worth suffering an 80% failure rate? it can communicate with hosts that have only IPv6, it can communicate with hosts that are stuck behind a single IPv4 address (if the router acts as a 6to4 gateway) without a NAT being in the way, it can be used to develop and test IPv6 applications without having to build a special-purpose network, it can be used to deploy applications now that already support IPv6 and so are in some sense future-proofed, it can be deployed on either a single host or a network again, trying to judge how well 6to4 works by how well it works with web sites that also support IPv4 is entirely missing the point. Keith _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf