Re: one data point regarding native IPv6 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jun 14, 2011, at 12:57 AM, Michel Py wrote:

>> Keith Moore wrote:
>> 6to4 awesome.  it's those BGP advertisements for broken relay
>> routers, and those ISPs that filter protocol 41 that are bad.
> 
> I won't go as far as supporting you on this one. Anything that makes the network work, good. Anything that breaks the network, bad.

There are several problems with that logic:

One problem is that the network doesn't entirely break or not break in the presence of feature X; it works for some people and breaks for some others.

Another is that it doesn't address tussles.  If feature X and feature Y are mutually incompatible, in that use of feature X breaks feature Y and vice versa, who is to say which feature is good and which is "breaking" the network? 

Another is that when (some) network operators configure their network in such a way as to break feature X, others use that breakage as an excuse to justify breaking even more things.

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]