On 6/12/2011 12:33 PM, Michel Py wrote:
If the argument is that IPv6 "native" should be the preferred Solution over "tunneled", it does not hold water. If you were to remove 6to4 and 6RD from the picture, that would set us back 10 years ago in terms of IPv6 adoption.
Can you explain the exact mechanism by which what you're concerned about will occur? I don't see anything in the draft which prevents an ISP from deploying 6rd.
Doug (but I might have missed something) -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf